DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-35529
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Volume 20 article 1008 pages: 1027-1033
To study the seismic properties of buildings in Almaty, a special test site operates. It includes buildings with conventional strip foundations with a system of cross belts and seismic support of 2 types. The landfill buildings were previously tested under static and dynamic influences. With the use of real accelerograms of earthquakes, a forecast of the behavior of a seismically isolated house on kinematic foundations under seismic influences has been carried out. The seismic impact is represented by a set of real accelerograms of strong, mainly Californian earthquakes. The hearts depths and magnitudes correspond to possible Almaty earthquakes. Two design schemes of a seismically isolated building are considered - single-mass and 10-mass dynamic building models. It is shown that the magnitudes of displacements in the kinematic foundations (KF) level obtained by two dynamic models usually differ within 5-10%. Therefore, the calculation of seismically isolated buildings can be applied to a single-mass non-linear dynamic model. A linear regression connection was obtained between the values of acceleration at the base and displacements at the level of the foundation. For the values of acceleration according to the new "Map of seismic zoning of the Republic of Kazakhstan" were obtained the predicted values of displacement at the level of the kinematic support of the order of 8.0-11.5 cm.
The research was carried out using the funds of the grant AP 05130702 of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
1 Cherepinsky, Yu. D., Lapin, V.A. (1995). Fundamentals of Seismic Isolation in Construction. Irkutsk: ELITE Publishing House.
2 Cherepinsky, Yu. D. (2003). Seismic isolation of residential buildings. Almaty: KazGASA.
3 Lapin, V.A., Yerzhanov, S.Y., Aldakhov, Y.S. (2020). Special polygon for investigation of seismic insulation properties of foundations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, no. 1614 012009, DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1614/1/012009
4 Lapin, V.A., Yerzhanov, S.Y., Aldakhov, Y.S. (2020). Statistical modeling of a seismic isolation object under random seismic exposure. Journal Physics: Conference Series, no. 1425, 1-9, from http://doi.org/10.1088 /1742=6596/1425 /1/0112006.
5 Wei Biao, Wang Peng, He Xuhui, Jiang Lizhong. (2018). Seismic Isolation Characteristics of a Friction System. Journal of Testing & Evaluation, no. 46 (4), 1-10, DOI:10.1520/JTE20160598
6 Bulat, A. F., Dyrda, V. I., Lysytsya, M.I., Grebenyuk, S. M. (2018). Numerical Simulation of the Stress-Strain State of Thin-Layer Rubber-Metal Vibration Absorber Elements Under Nonlinear Deformation. Strength of Materials, no. 50(3), 387–395, from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-018-9982-9
7 Giarlelis, C., Kofalis, D., Repapis, C. (2020). Seismic Isolation: An Effective Technique for the Seismic Retrofitting of a Reinforced Concrete Building. Structural Engineering, no. 30(1), 43-52, from http://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2019.1678449
8 Casablanca, O., Venture, G., Garesci, F., Azzerboni, B., Chiaia, B., Chiappini, M. (2018). Seismic Isolation of building using composite foundation based on metamaterials. Journal of Applied Physics, no. 123(17), from http://doi.org/10.1063/1.5018005
9 Ishii, K., Kikuchi, M. (2019). Improved numerical analysis for ultimate behavior of elastometric seismic isolation bearings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, no. 48(1), 65-77, from http://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3123
10 Marsis, N. (2019). Seismic isolation: Early history. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, no. 48(1), 269-283, from http://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3124
11 Yerzhanov, S. (2020). On some issues of taking account of the interaction of seismically isolating pile foundations with foundation soil under seismic effects. 16th World Conference on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation on Active Vibration Conference of Structures, 955-963, from http://doi.org/10.13753./2686-7974-2019-16-919-927
12 Lapin, V. (2020). Сomparative Analysis of the Effect of Seismic Isolation by Means of Stations of Engineering Seismometric Service on Buildings. 16th World Conference on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation on Active Vibration Conference of Structures, 325-332, from http://doi.org/10.13753./2686-7974-2019-16-482-527
13 Tsang, H., Pitiliakis, K. (2019). Mechanism of geotechnical seismic isolation system: Analytical modeling. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, no. 122, DOI:10.1016/j.solidyn.2019.03.37
14 Bulat, A.F., Dyrda, V.I., Grebenyuk, S.N., Agal’tsov, G. N. (2019). Methods for evaluating the characteristics of the stress-strain state of seismic blocks under operating conditions. Strength of Materials, no. 51(5), 715-720, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-019-00129-x
15 Bulat, A.F., Dyrda, V.I., Grebenyuk, S.N., Klimenko, M.I. (2019). Determination of effective characteristics of the fibrous viscoelastic composite with transversal and isotropic components. Strength of Materials, no. 51(2), 183-192, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-019-00064-x
16 Smirnov, V.I. (2009). Testing of buildings with seismic isolation systems with dynamic loads and real earthquakes. Earthquake-resistant construction. Safety of structures, no. 4, 16-22.
17 Mikhailova, N.N., Uzbekov, A.N. (2018). Tectonic and technogenic earthquakes in central Kazakhstan. News of the national academy of sciences of the republic of Kazakhstan. Series of geology and technical sciences, no. 429(3), 146-155.
18 Fardis, M., Carvalho, O., Elnashai, A., Faccioli, E., Pinto, P., Plumier, A. (2013). Designer's Guide to Eurocode 8: Design of earthquake-resistant structures: General design standards for earthquake-resistant structures, seismic effects, building and retaining structure design rules. Moscow: MGSU.