Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privreduJournal of Applied Engineering Science

AIRFOIL TYPES EFFECT ON GEOMETRY AND PERFORMANCE OF A SMALL-SCALE WIND TURBINE BLADE DESing


DOI: 10.5937/jaes18-23413
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 terms and conditions. 
Creative Commons License

Volume 18 article 669 pages: 132 - 139

Sigit Iswahyudi*
Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Sutrisno 
Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Prajitno
Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Setyawan Bekti Wibowo
Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Many airfoils could be used to form a wind turbine blade. Different airfoil would result in an altered blade planform and its performance characteristics. Airfoil identification that should be included in the design then becomes an important task. Utilizing Blade Element Momentum Theory computation procedures, eleven types of airfoils were applied in blade geometries of rotors of 2.4 m in diameters. The changes in the distribution of chord lengths, twists, solidity ratio, and Reynolds numbers of the blades were compared as geometry parameters. The designed and off designed powers and thrusts were calculated, and the characteristics of the performance of the rotor were represented by the coefficient of power and coefficient of thrust. The calculated geometries showed that distinct airfoils resulted in different segments sizes of the blades and different performance characteristics of the rotors.The use of an airfoil that has a high lift coefficient and a high glide ratio in the design of a blade will produce a narrow blade and a small solidity ratio. The design will also have a high power coefficient at the tip speed ratio design. However, the blade power coefficient may be sensitive to changes in rotational speed.

View article

The authors acknowledge LPDP, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia, for the fund support of the present work (No. PRJ-4863/LPDP.3/2016).

1. Sangston, K., Little, J., Lyall, M.E., Sondergaard, R. (2014). Endwall Loss Reduction of High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Profile Contouring—Part I: Airfoil Design. Journal of Turbomachinery. vol. 136, no. 8, 081005-1-081005–9, DOI: 10.1115/1.4025952.

2. Wang, Q., Wang, J., Chen, J. et al. (2015). Aerodynamic Shape Optimized Design for Wind Turbine Blade Using New Airfoil Series. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. vol. 29, no. 7, 2871–2882, DOI: 10.1007/s12206-015-0616-x.

3. Shen, X., Yang, H., Chen, J. et al. (2016). Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Non-straight Small Wind Turbine Blades. Energy Conversion and Management. vol. 119, 266–278, DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.008.

4. Hashem, I., Mohamed, M.H. (2018). Aerodynamic Performance Enhancements of H-rotor Darrieus Wind Turbine. Energy. vol. 142, 531–545, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.036.

5. Chattot, J.J. (2009). Effects of Blade Tip Modifications on Wind Turbine Performance Using Vortex Model. Computers and Fluids. vol. 38, no. 7, 1405–1410, DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.01.022.

6. Numan, M., Kose, F., Ingham, D. et al. (2018). Aerodynamic Performance of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine with Forward and Backward Swept Blades. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics. vol. 176, no. February, 166–173, DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.03.023.

7. Pavese, C., Kim, T., Murcia, J.P. (2016). Design of a Wind Turbine Swept Blade through Extensive Load Analysis. Renewable Energy. vol. 102, 21–34, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.039.

8. Khamlaj, T.A., Rumpfkeil, M.P. (2017). Theoretical analysis of shrouded horizontal axis wind turbines. Energies. vol. 10, no. 1, 1–19, DOI: 10.3390/en10010038.

9. Neammanee, B., Sirisumrannukul, Somporn Chatratana, S. (2010). Control Strategies for Variable-speed Fixed-pitch Wind Turbines. Muyeen SM (ed.), Wind Power. INTECH. pp 209–230.

10. Maheswari, R.U., Tamilvendhan, J. (2012). Analysis of Modelling of Active Stall Controlled and Active Pitch controlled Variable Speed Wind Turbines. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research. vol. 2, no. 4, 2662–2667,

11. Farouk, A., Gawad, A. (2013). New, Simple Blade-Pitch Control Mechanism for Small-Size, Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering. vol. 7, 2237–2248,

12. Luiz, R., Freitas, U. De, Patrícia, B., Gonçalves, F. (2017). A Revised Theoretical Analysis of Aerodynamic Optimization of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines Based on BEM Theory. Renewable Energy. vol. 105, 625–636, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.12.076.

13. Li, J., Yu, X.B. (2017). Analyses of the Extensible Blade in Improving Wind Energy Production at Sites with Low-Class Wind Resource. Energies. vol. 10, no. 1295, 1–24, DOI: 10.3390/en10091295.

14. Ahmed, N.A. (2013). A Novel Small Scale Efficient Wind Turbine for Power Generation. Renewable Energy. vol. 57, 79–85, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.023.

15. Ma, D., Zhao, Y., Qiao, Y., Li, G. (2015). Effects of Relative Thickness on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Airfoil at A Low Reynolds Number. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. vol. 28, no. 4, 1003–1015, DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2015.05.012.

16. Wang, Q., Wang, J., Sun, J. et al. (2016). Optimal Design of Wind Turbine Airfoils Based on Functional Integral and Curvature Smooth Continuous Theory. Aerospace Science and Technology. vol. 55, 34–42, DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.05.004.

17. Schaffarczyk, A.P. (2014). Introduction to Wind Turbine Aerodynamics.10.1007/978-3-642-36409-9

18. Gundtoft, S. (2009). Wind Turbines. University College of Aarhus.

19. Burton, T., Sharpe, D., Jenkins, N., Bossanyi, E. (2001). Wind Energy Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., West Sussex, England.

20. Velázquez, M.T., Vega, M., Carmen, D. et al. (2014). Design and Experimentation of a 1 MW Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering. vol. 2014, no. January, 9–16, DOI: 10.4236/jpee.2014.21002.

21. Hjort, S., Larsen, H. (2015). Rotor Design for Diffuser Augmented Wind Turbines. Energies. vol. 8, no. 10, 10736–10774, DOI: 10.3390/en81010736.

22. Hsiao, F.-B., Bai, C.-J., Chong, W.-T. (2013). The Performance Test of Three Different Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT) Blade Shapes Using Experimental and Numerical Methods. Energies. vol. 6, no. 6, 2784–2803, DOI: 10.3390/en6062784.

23. Jensen, M.F., Branner, K. (2013). Introduction to Wind Turbine Blade Design. Brøndsted P, Nijssen RPL (eds.), Advances in Wind Turbine Blade Design and Materials. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge. pp 1–28.

24. Kaviani, H.R., Nejat, A. (2017). Aerodynamic Noise Prediction of a MW-class HAWT Using Shear Wind Profile Pressure Implicit with Splitting of Operator. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics. vol. 168, no. June, 164–176, DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.06.003.

25. Larsen, J.W., Nielsen, S.R.K., Krenk, S. (2007). Dynamic Stall Model for Wind Turbine Airfoils. Journal of Fluids and Structures. vol. 23, 959–982, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.02.005.

26. Li, Q., Maeda, T., Kamada, Y. et al. (2017). Investigation of Power Performance and Wake on a Straight-bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine With Field Experiments. Energy. vol. 141, 1113–1123, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.009.

27. Moshfeghi, M., Shams, S., Hur, N. (2017). Aerodynamic Performance Enhancement Analysis of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Using a Passive Flow Control Method Via Split Blade. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. vol. 167, no. May, 148–159, DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.04.001.

28. Shu, L., Qiu, G., Hu, Q. et al. (2018). Numerical and Field Experimental Investigation of Wind Turbine Dynamic De-icing Process. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics. vol. 175, no. February, 90–99, DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.043.

29. Biadgo, A.M., Aynekulu, G. (2017). Aerodynamic Design of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blades. FME Transactions (2017). vol. 45, no. 4, 647–660, DOI: 10.5937/fmet1704647m.

30. Ragheb, M., Ragheb, A.M. (2011). Wind Turbines Theory - The Betz Equation and Optimal Rotor Tip Speed Ratio. Carriveau R (ed.), Fundamental and Advanced Topics in Wind Power. InTech. pp 19–38.