Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privreduJournal of Applied Engineering Science


DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-35839 
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Creative Commons License

Volume 20 article 999 pages: 937-945

Aries Sulisetyono*
Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya, Indonesia

Zambilly A. Washoya
Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya, Indonesia

Achmad Zubaydi
Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya, Indonesia

The water impact at the bottom of a floatplane upon landing is one of the biggest concerns related to the structure strength. The free fall of the floater to the water’s surface is ideal for modelling to acquire a pressure value against the optimal design angle of the deadrise and flare. The impact pressure due to free-falling of the 2D cross-section of the floater at four different deadrise angles is computed using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique in FLUENT's dynamic mesh feature. According to the simulation results, the angle of deadrise impacts the pressure on the floater bottom area that decreases along with the increase in deadrise angle. Flares also help to lessen the pressure value under all deadrise angle scenarios. All models have good agreement when compared to the modified Wagner's formula, with an average inaccuracy of roughly 5.27 percent.

View article

The author wishes to express his gratitude to RISTEK BRIN Indonesia for providing financial assistance under the Basic Research scheme with contract no. 3/AMD/E1/KP.PTNBH/2020.

1. Sell, C. (2011). Validation of Seaplane Impact Load Theory and Structural Analysis of the Martin 270. M.S. Theses, Department School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, University of New Orleans, New Orleans.

2. F. A. A. (2004). Seaplane, skiplane, and float/ski equipped helicopter operations handbook. FAA-H-8083-23, Washington DC.

3. Milwitzky, B. (1952). Generalized theory for seaplane impact. NACA Technical Report, no. 1103, NACA, USA.

4. Karman, T. V. (1929) The impact on seaplane floats during landing, NACA Technical Note, no. 321, NACA, USA.

5. Wagner, H. (1932). The phenomena of impact and planing on water. NACA Translation, no. 1366, NACA, USA.

6. Chuang, S.L. (1996). Slamming of rigid wedge-shaped bodies with various deadrise angle, Technical Report DTMB-2268, DTMB Washington, USA.

7. Dobrovol'skaya, Z.N. (1969). On some problems of similarity flow of fluid with a free surface. Journal Fluid Mechanic, vol. 36, no. 4, 805-829, DOI: 10.1017/S0022112069001 996

8. Greenhow, M. (1987). Wedge entry into initially calm water. Applied Ocean Research, vol. 9, no. 4, 214-223, DOI: 10.10 16/01411187(87)90003-4

9. Korobkin, A.A., Pukhnachov, V.V. (1988). Initial stage of water impact, Annual Review Fluid Mechanic, vol. 20, 159-185, DOI: 10.1 146/annurev.fl.20.010188.001111

10. Kapsenberg, G. K. (2011). Slamming of ships: where were we now?. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society A, vol. 369, no. 1947, 2892-2919, DOI:10.1098/rsta.20 11.0118

11. Zhao, R., Faltinsen, O.M. (1993). Water entry of two-dimensional bodies. Journal of Fluid Mechanic, vol. 246, 593-612, DOI:10. 1017/S002211209300028X

12. Faltinsen, O.M. (2005). Hydrodynamics of high-speed vehicles. Cambridge University Press, UK.

13. Yettou, E. M., Desrochers, A., Champoux, Y. (2007). A new analytical model for pressure estimation of symmetrical water impact of a rigid wedge at variable velocities. Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 23, no. 3, 501-522, DOI:10.1016/j.jfluid structs.2006.10.001

14. Dong, C., Sun, S., Song, H., Wang, Q. (2019). Numerical and experimental study on the impact between a free-falling wedge and water. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, 233-243, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2 018.04.004

15. Yu, P., Ong, M.C., Li, H. (2018). Effects of Added Mass and Structural Damping on Dynamic Responses of a 3D Wedge Impacting on Water. Applied Science, vol. 8, no. 5, 802, DOI: 10.3390/app8050802

16. Wen, X., Liu, P., Qu, Q., Hu, T. (2020). Impact of wedge bodies on wedge-shaped water surface with varying speed, Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 92, 102831, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102831

17. Wang, K., Ma, X., Bai, W., Lin, Z., Li, Y. (2021). Numerical simulation of water entry of a symmetric/asymmetric wedge into waves using OpenFOAM. Ocean Engineering, vol. 227, 108923, DOI: 10.10 16/j.oceaneng.2021.108923

18. Gudmundsson, S. (2021). General Aviation Aircraft Design: Applied Method and Procedures 2nd Edition, Elsevier Inc., Netherlands.

19. Aliffrananda, M.H., Sulisetyono, A. (2021). Porpoising Instability Study of the Floatplane during Takeoff Operation on Calm Water. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1052, 012013.

20. Aliffrananda, M.H., Sulisetyono, A., Hermawan, Y.A., Zubaydi, A. (2022). Numerical analysis of floatplane porpoising instability at calm water during take-off. International Journal Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, 190-201, DOI: 10.14716/ijtech.v13i1. 4903

21. Sulisetyono, A., Fadhlurrohman, I., Ali, B., Zubaydi, A. (2022). Computational prediction of the resistance of the the floatplane at various trim angles. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, vol. 60, no. 2, 265 – 276, DOI: 10.15632/jtam-pl/148053

22. Halliday, D., Resnick, R., Walker, J. (2021). Fundamentals of physics 12th edition. John Wiley & Sons, USA.

23. Code of Federal Regulation (CFR). Aeronautics and space, from https://www. er-C/part-25/subpart-C/subject-group-ECF R99790d9728306e9, 2022-04-15.