This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Volume 20 article 1022 pages: 1175-1183
Non-ferrous material frequently slipped failure, hard clamp surface press slip occurs, and non-metal material lacks a rigidity hold for the clamp, resulting in a slip or break before the limit strength. So as efforts to prevent this problem are carried out from additional grips to reduce the occurrence of slips to obtain an increased testing accuracy. Additional grip designs are created using material sizes specified by ASTM D638. material grip receives pressure equal to 106.4 MPa, so to prevent deformation, stainless material is chosen as additional grip. This test is to determine the quality of the materials used for the ship. In this research, a test using additional grip was developed to improve technology for the test. Continued data analysis and a conclusion were obtained that the tensile test using tools has a high success rate. Rubber and fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) specimens have a success rate of 60%. The factor causing the low success rate of wood testing is that the wood fibres have an irregular direction, so this uncertainty makes the tensile test results unsuccessful. From the tensile testing process, the ultimate stress value of specimens without grip tools is lower than tests with additional grips. The ultimate stress rubber value was 51.92%, the FRP was 16.40% more than the ultimate stress with the average value, and furthermore, the tensile strength of HDPE also elongated as accepted by the rules.
The authors wished to thank the Ministry of Research, Technology and BRIN for Doctoral Program Research Grant of the year 2022 with entitled “Studi kehandalan konstruksi kapal berbahan HDPE akibat beban gelombang acak with contract number 084/E5/PG.02.00.PT/2022, and 1381/PKS/ITS/2022. The authors also thank to Laboratory Ship Strength and Construction helps in experimental tests.
1. ISO. (2016). Metallic materials - Tensile Testing. British Standard Institution. United Kingdom.
2. International, A. (2002) Atlas of Stress-Strain Diagrams. ASM International. United States of America.
3. Ariesta, R. C., Zubaydi, A., Ismail, A., Tuswan, T. (2021). Damage evaluation of sandwich material on side plate hull using experimental modal analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings. p. 2310-2314.
4. ASM. (2017). Engineering Properties of Magnesium Alloys. ASM Internasional. United States of America.
5. Hardy, S. H., Yulianto, T., Putra, W.H.P., Ariesta, R.C. (2020). Influence of the Cut-out Shape on the Fatigue Ship Structural Detail. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Ocean and Coastal Engineering, Environmental and Natural Disaster Management (ISOCEEN). p. 111 – 115.
6. Malag, L., Kukielka, L., Kukielka, K., Kułakowska, A., Bohdal, L., Patyk, R. (2014). Problems Determining of the Mechanical Properties of Metallic Materials from the Tensile Test in the Aspect of Numerical Calculations of the Technological Processes. Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 474, p. 454-459, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.474.454.
7. Davis, J. R. (2004). Tensile Testing. ASM International. USA.
8. ASTM. (2017). ASTM D638: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM Standards. USA.
9. Westergaard, H. M. (2013) Theory of Elasticity and Plasticity. Harvard University Press. England.
10. Cimbala, J. M. (2013). Stress, Strain, and Strain Gages. Publisher: Penn State University. USA.
11. Matsuo, T., Hojo, M., Kageyama, K. (2019). Influence of gripping method on tensile properties of unidirectional thermoplastic CFRP – Round-robin activity for international standardization in Japan. Journal Composite Materials. Vol 53, No. 28-30. p. 4161-4171. DOI: 10.1177/0021998319855419.
12. Fujita, M., Masuda, T. (2014). Application of Various NDT Methods for the Evaluation of Building Steel Structures for Reuse. Materials. Vol. 7, no. 10, p. 7130-7144. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7107130.
13. JIS Z 2241, (2020). Metallic Materials - Tensile Testing - Method of Test at Room Temperature. Japanese Standards Association (JSA). Japan.
14. ASTM. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomers Tension. ASTM International. United States.
15. Tu, S., Ren, X., He, J., Zhang, Z. (2019). Stress – strain curves of metallic materials and post ‐ necking strain hardening characterization: A review. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol 43, no. 1, p. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13134.
16. Chen, J., Guan, Z., Ma, P., Li, Z., Gao, D. (2020). Experimental extrapolation of hardening curve for cylindrical specimens via pre-torsion tension tests. Journal of Strain Analysis, vol 55., no. 1-2., p. 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324719887863.
17. Misbah, M.N., Ariesta, R. C., Yulianto, T., Setyawan, D., Putra W.H.A. (2022). Study numerical and experimental of stress concentration factor on isotropic plate with hole. Materials Physics and Mechanics. (In press)
18. [BKI. (2021). Guidance for the classification and construction part 3 special ships: Rules for Fibreglass Reinforced Plastic Ships. Biro Klasifikasi Indonesia. Indonesia.
19. [Manap, N., Jumahat, A., Sapiai, N. (2015). Effect Of Fibre Treatment on Longitudinal and Transverse Tensile Properties of Unidirectional Kenaf Composite. Jurnal Teknologi. Vol 76, no. 11, p. 87-95. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5918
20. rahco-rubber. HNBR or Highly Saturated Nitrile Halogenated Acryonitrile Butadiene. From https://rahco-rubber.com/materials/hnbr-hydrogenated-nitrile-butadiene-rubber/, accessed on 2022 January 05.
21. Polymerdatabase. High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE). From https://polymerdatabase.com/CommercialPolymers/HDPE.html. Accessed on 2021 August 10
22. Omnexus. Elongation at Break Values of Several Plastics. From https://omnexus.specialchem.com/polymer-properties/properties/elongation-at-break. Accessed on 2021 November 26
23. Tentative Rules (2014), Polyethylene crafts. From www.turkloydu.org. Accesed on 2022 March 14.
24. Ariesta, R.C., Zubaydi, A., Ismail, A., Tuswan, T. (2022). Identification of Damage Size Effect of Natural Frequency on Sandwich Material using Free Vibration Analysis. Nase more. vol 69, no 1, pp 1-8. DOI 10.17818/NM/2022/1.1.
25. Tuswan, T., Zubaydi, A., Piscesa, B., Ismail, A., Ariesta, R.C., Ilham, M.F. (2021). Influence of application of sandwich panel on static and dynamic behaviour of ferry ro-ro ramp door. Journal of Applied Engineering Science. vol 19, no. 4, p. 208-216. DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-27708.
26. Ismail, A., Zubaydi, A., Piscesa, B., Tuswan, T., Ariesta, R.C. (2021). Study of sandwich panel application on side hull of crude oil tanker. Journal of Applied Engineering Science. vol 19, no. 4, p. 1090-1098. DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-30373.