iipp publishingJournal of Applied Engineering Science

A MODEL OF ANALYSIS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH SYSTEM IN THE PRODUCTION SYSTEM


DOI 10.5937/jaes17-21372
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 terms and conditions. 
Creative Commons License


Volume 17 article 605 pages: 264 - 272

Biljana Vranjes*
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Banja Luka     
Mladen Todic
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Banja Luka

The occupational safety and health system as an integral part of the organization of work includes a set of technical and organized measures and activities aimed at achieving safety at work, elimination and prevention of hazards/ harmfulness that can cause occupational injuries, occupational and other diseases and the protection of health and working capacity workers. The main goal of occupational safety and health is to reduce the number of accidents, injuries, occupational diseases and work-related illnesses. An efficient way of managing the occupational safety and health system is achieved by defining, monitoring and adjusting the performance indicators through a systemic and process approach. The modern concept of occupational safety implies that every worker sees himself as an active participant in the occupational safety system who can contribute to the achievement of his goals, but also the responsibility for the process of improving occupational safety for everyone in the organization. A model of analysis presented in this research enables workers to express their views on the elements of the occupational safety and health system in their organization. By applying this model, we can analyze the input elements related to the profile of workers that influence the acceptance and adoption of basic rules and occupational safety measures. The results of the analysis can be an important source of information in the process of knowledge management in the occupational safety system through the creation of measures to eliminate organizational and functional deficiencies.

View article
  1. Anđelković, B. (2010).The basics of the protection system. University of Niš, Faculty of occupational safety in Niš, Niš, ISBN  978-86-6093-018-9, COBISS.SR-ID 180624908
  2. Knegtering,B. (2002). Safetylifecyclemanagementintheprocessindustries:the developmentofaqualitativesafety-relatedinformationanalysistechnique.Eindhoven: TechnischeUniversiteitEindhoven, ISBN 90-386-1747-X
  3. Milazzo, F.M. (2016).On the importance of managerial and organisational variables in the quantitative risk assessment. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, Vol.14, No.1,353, 54-60, DOI:10.5937/jaes14-9842
  4. Wachter, K. J., Yorio, L. P. (2014). A system of safety management practices and worker engagementfor reducing and preventing accidents: An empirical andtheoretical investigation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, volume 68, july 2014, pages 117-130, doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.029
  5. Sun,Y., Arning, M.,Bochmann, F., Börger, J., Heitmann, T. (2018). Development and Validation of a Practical Instrument for Injury Prevention: The Occupational Safety and Health Monitoring and Assessment Tool (OSH-MAT). Safety and Health at Work, Volume 9, Issuse 2, June 2018, pages 140-143, doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.07.006
  6. Spasić, D. (2001). Occupational Safety Economics. Graphic company SVEN, Niš, Serbia
  7. Krstić, I. (2010). Models for systemic analysis of technological systems(Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Occupational Safety in Niš, Niš, Serbia)
  8. Vankataraman, N. (2008). Safety Performance Factor.International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE), Vol. 14, No. 3, 327-331, doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2008.11076772
  9. Rajaprasad, S. V. S., Chalapathi, P. V. (2016). An analysis of accident trends andmodeling of safety indices in an Indian construction organization.Independent Journal of Management & Production (IJM&P), v. 7, n. 3, ISSN: 2236-269X,DOI: 10.14807/ijmp.v7i3.432
  10. Živković, S., Pavlović, D. (2014). The comparative analysis of the number of occupational injuries in Serbia, Croatia and Slovenia in 2012. Facta Universitatis, Series: Working and Living Environmental rotection, Vol. 11, No 1, 53 - 64, UDC 517:614.8.027, ISSN 2406-0534
  11. Stranks, J. (2002). Health and safety at Work: Key Terms, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, Great Britain, ISBN 0 7506 5446 5
  12. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (Version 15), Allen & Unwin
  13. Petz, B. (1997). Basic statistical methods for non-mathematicians, Edition Waterfall, Zagreb, Croatia, UDK 311(075.8), ISBN 978-953-191-058-3
  14. Asuero, G. A., Sayago, A., Gonz´alez, G. A. (2006). The Correlation Coefficient: An Overview.Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 36:41-59, 2006, Copyright ÓTaylor and Francis Group, LLC, ISSN: 1040-8347, print / 1547-6510 online, DOI: 10.1080/10408340500526766
  15. Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between + 1 / − 1, or do they ?.Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing,Vol. 17, 2, 139-142, doi: 10.1057/jt.2009.5