iipp publishingJournal of Applied Engineering Science


DOI 10.5937/jaes17-21960
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 terms and conditions. 
Creative Commons License

Volume 17 article 632 pages: 468 - 472

Erlin Windia Ambarsari 
Engineering and Computer Science Faculty, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia

Aulia Ar Rakhman Awaludin 
Engineering and Computer Science Faculty, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia

Andri Suryana 
Post Graduate of Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia

Purni Munah Hartuti 
Engineering and Computer Science Faculty, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia

Robbi Rahim 
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma, Indonesia

Decision Tree in Data Mining frequently used to learn the pattern by interpreting data. A hierarchy of tree model in Decision Tree as data visualization which often used makes fully load space. Another option in using model is Phytagoras Tree. Pythagoras Tree in this study is the basic concept of Pythagorean Theorem that used by a binary hierarchy with a fractal technique which the shape using the square as branches enclose a right triangle. A fractal of Pythagoras Tree is the dataset which split the subsets into trunks and leaves. Construct a fractal of  Pythagoras Tree depends on the angle θ for build branches followed by square area. Pythagoras Tree model is an easy way to understanding the dataset based on the size of the square. The smaller the size, the fewer instances in the rectangle. Also, data associations easily traced when filled with color.

View article

1. F. Beck, M. Burch, T. Munz, L. Di Silvestro, and D. Weiskopf, “Generalized Pythagoras Trees for Visualizing Hierarchies,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications, 2014, pp. 17–28.

2. A. E. Bosman, Het wondere onderzoekingsveld der vlakke meetkunde. Breda: N.V. Uitgeversmaatschappij Parcival, 1957.

3. B. Ratner, “Pythagoras: Everyone knows his famous theorem, but not who discovered it 1000 years before him,” J. Targeting, Meas. Anal. Mark., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 229–242, Sep. 2009.

4. L. Teia, “Anatomy of the Pythagoras’ tree,” Aust. Sr. Math. J., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 38–47, 2016.

5. L. T. Gomes, “Pythagoras Triples Explained via Central Squares,” Aust. Sr. Math. J., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2015.

6. V. Dlab and K. S. Williams, “The Many Sides of the Pythagorean Theorem,” Coll. Math. J., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 162–172, 2019.

7. J. R. Parada-Daza, M. I. Parada-Contzen, J. R. Parada-Daza, and M. I. Parada-Contzen, “Pythagoras and the Creation of Knowledge,” Open J. Philos., vol. 04, no. 01, pp. 68–74, Jan. 2014.

8. J. R. Quinlan, “Induction of Decision Trees,” Mach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–106, 1986.

9. L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone, Classification And Regression Trees. Routledge, 2017.

10. J. R. Quinlan, C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. 1993.

11. S. Swaminathan, “The Pythagorean Theorem,” J. Biodiversity, Bioprospecting Dev., vol. 01, no. 03, pp. 1–4, Sep. 2014.

12. M. F. Al-Saleh and A. E. Yousif, “Properties of the Standard Deviation that are Rarely Mentioned in Classrooms,” AUSTRIAN J. Stat., vol. 38, pp. 193–202, 2009.

13. E. W. Ambarsari, S. Khotijah, and L. Sunarmintyastuti, “Pemodelan Reward Rule Game Streamer Indonesia Tingkat Amatir dengan Orange Data Mining,” STRING (Satuan Tulisan Ris. dan Inov. Teknol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–17, Aug. 2019.

14. W. A. C. Rojas and C. M. Villegas, “Graphical representation and exploratory visualization for decision trees in the KDD process,” Proc. - 2012 9th Electron. Robot. Automot. Mech. Conf. CERMA 2012, vol. 73, no. Dm, pp. 203–210, 2012.