iipp publishingJournal of Applied Engineering Science


DOI 10.5937/jaes17-23443
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 terms and conditions. 
Creative Commons License

Volume 17 article 650 pages: 590- 598

Milos Vorkapic
University of Belgrade, ICTM - CMT, Serbia

Dragan Cockalo 
University of Novi Sad, Technical faculty ”Mihajlo Pupin” Zrenjanin, Serbia

Vesna Spasojevic Brkic
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Serbia

Dejan Djordjevic
University of Belgrade, ICTM - CMT, Serbia

Aleksandar Brkic
Innovation Center, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Serbia

Gap analysis represents a tool for raising the level of performances of products, processes and enterprise organization which is rarely used in risk management. This paper proposes the joint application of Gap and Pareto analysis, in aim to mitigate possible risks in production processes. It is based on the facts that key points in the production process indicate some serious oversights (gaps), characterized as errors, which can grow into risky elements that disturb the manufacturing process and final transmitter assembly.   
In this paper, finalizing and assembling pressure transmitter elements (modules), created by a domestic manufacturer, served as an example for the Gap analysis. Each electronic transmitter is consisted of three modules: measurement cell, mechanical coupling fixture and enclosure containing the electronics and the terminal block box. Through the implementation and assembly of these modules errors (or elements of potential risks) have been identified. Later on, using the Pareto chart, it has been seen that 80% of errors made during the transmitter manufacturing process have occured while implementing the first and the third transmitter module. Also, by analyzing the collected gaps, it has been concluded that the critical ones happen while using the existing technology and engaging workforce.
In order to eliminate the above-mentioned errors, this paper decidedly presents the Gap analysis steps  which should be followed, so the transmitter manufacturing process would be improved in terms of quality. Similar methodology could be applied to other products and processes.

View article

This work is a part of current projects TR-32008 and TR-35017 funded by Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia.

1. Milazzo, M. F. [2016]. O značaju menadžerskih i organizacionih varijabli u kvantitativnoj proceni rizika. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 14(1), 54-60.

2. Stanisavljev, S., Ćoćkalo, D., Đorđević, D., Minovski, R. [2013]. The production cycle time in serial production: Reduction of the duration in metal processing industry case. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 11(3), 15-122.

3. Conrow, E.H., & Shishido, P.S. (1997). Implementing risk management on software intensive projects. IEEE Software, 14(3), 83-89. doi:10.1109/52.589242

4. Miller, R., & Lessard, D. (2001). Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects. International Journal of Project Management, 19(8), 437-443. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(01)00045-x

5. Michalska, J. (2006). Quality costs in the production process. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 17, no. 1-2, 425-428.

6. Sousa, S., Nunes, E., & Lopes, I. (2015). Measuring and managing operational risk in industrial processes. FME Transaction, 43(4), 295-302. doi:10.5937/fmet1504295s

7. Stamenković, D., Popović, V., Spasojević-Brkić, V., & Radivojević, J. [2011]. Model optimizacije kombinacije garancije besplatne zamene i parcijalne garancije. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 9(4), 457-464.

8. Tilley, P.A., Mcfallen, S.L., & Tucker, S.N. (2000). Design and Documentation Quality and Its Impact on the Construction Process. AISC - IEAust Special Issue Steel Construction, vol. 34, no. 4, 7-14.

9. Kliem, R.L. (2000). Risk Management for Business Process Reengineering Projects. Information Systems Management, 17(4), 66-68. doi:10.1201/1078/43193.17.4.20000901/31256.12

10. Williams, T. (1995). A classified bibliography of recent research relating to project risk management. European Journal of Operational Research, 85(1), 18-38. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)e0363-3

11. Polk, R., Plank, R.E., & Reid, D.A. (1996). Technical risk and new product success: An empirical test in high technology business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6), 531-543. doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(96)00071-5

12. Awasthi, M. K., Sarsaiya, S., Wang, Q., Wang, M., Chen, H., Ren, X., Kumar, S., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Mitigation of Global Warming Potential for Cleaner Composting, Biosynthetic Technology and Environmental Challenges, Springer, Singapore, p. 271-305., DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7434-9_16

13. Vukelić, Đ., Budak, I., Tadić, B., Lužanin, O., Hadžistević, M., & Krizan, P. [2011]. Automatizovano generisanje šema baziranja radnog predmeta prilikom projektovanja pribora. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 9(3), 383-392.

14. Davis, R., Misra, S., & Van Auken, S. (2002). A gap analysis approach to marketing curriculum assessment: A study of skills and knowledge. Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 24, no. 3, 218-224, DOI: 10.1177/0273475302238044

15. Tsai, W. H., Hsu, W., & Chou, W. C. (2011). A gap analysis model for improving airport service quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 22, no. 10, 1025-1040, DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2011.611326

16. Marra, M., Di Biccari, C., Lazoi, M., & Corallo, A. (2018). A Gap Analysis Methodology for Product Lifecycle Management Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 65, no. 1, 155-167, DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2017.2762401

17. Mogos, M. F., Fredriksson, A., & Alfnes, E. (2019). A production transfer procedure based on risk management principles. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, vol. 12, no. 1, 103-150, DOI: 10.1108/JGOSS-01-2018-0001

18. Garza-Reyes, J. A., Romero, J. T., Govindan, K., Cherrafi, A., & Ramanathan, U. (2018). A PDCA-based approach to Environmental Value Stream Mapping (E-VSM). Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 180, 335-348, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.121

19. Cheng, T. C. E., & Musaphir, H. (1996). Theory and practice of manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Production Research, vol. 34, no. 5, 1243-1259, DOI: 10.1080/00207549608904963

20. Haron, N. Z., & Kairudin, F. L. M. (2012). The application of quality function deployment (QFD) in the design phase of industrialized building system (IBS) apartment construction project. European International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 3, 56-66

21. Govindaluri, S. M., & Cho, B. R. (2007). Robust design modeling with correlated quality characteristics using a multicriteria decision framework. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 32, no. 5, 423-433, DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-0349-6

22. Sokovic, M., Pavletic, D., & Fakin, S. (2005). Application of Six Sigma methodology for process design. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 162, 777-783, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.231

23. Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., & Zhang, Y. (2004). Product modularity: measures and design methods. Journal of engineering Design, vol. 15, no. 1, 33-51, DOI: 10.1080/0954482032000101731

24. ElMaraghy, W., ElMaraghy, H., Tomiyama, T., & Monostori, L. (2012). Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, vol. 61, no 2, 793-814, DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.001

25. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. MIT press.DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001

26. Hölttä-Otto, K., & De Weck, O. (2007). Degree of modularity in engineering systems and products with technical and business constraints. Concurrent Engineering, vol. 15, no. 2, 113-126, DOI: 10.1177/1063293X07078931

27. Engel, A., Browning, T. R., & Reich, Y. (2017). Designing products for adaptability: insights from four industrial cases. Decision Sciences, vol. 48, no. 5, 875-917, DOI: 10.1111/deci.12254

28. Sinha, K. & Suh, E. S. (2018). Pareto-optimization of complex system architecture for structural complexity and modularity. Research in Engineering Design, vol. 29, no. 1, 123-141, DOI: 10.1007/s00163-017-0260-9

29. Rechtin, E. & Maier, M. W. (2010). The art of systems architecting. CRC press.

30. Branscomb, L. M. & Auerswald, P. E. (2003). Taking Technical Risks: How Innovators, Managers, and Investors Manage Risk in High-Tech Innovations. MIT Press.