Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privreduJournal of Applied Engineering Science


DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-36882 
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Creative Commons License

Volume 21 article 1046 pages: 6-28

Lina Shbeeb*
Hussein Technical University, Amman, Jordan

Limited research has been conducted in developing countries on travel behavior and its prediction. This study aimed to investigate if socio-economic conditions affect travel behavior patterns in Amman, Jordan, and propose regression models for trips defining the contributory factors. A total of 681 interviews were conducted with households (210) and workplace employees (335), assessing behavioural travel styles in two neighbourhoods with different characteristics. Compared to residents of high-income areas (HIA), residents of low-income areas (LIAs) travel more by all modes of transportation; in LIA and HIA, the trip rate per person was (2.2) and (2.0), respectively, while in low-income and high-income areas, the number of trips per household was 5.14 (153.6 minutes) and 3.7 (155 minutes). Most household trips in low-income neighbourhoods, mainly for education and work, were made on foot, while private cars were more common in high-income areas. For trips related to the office and shops, the private car was the most common mode of transportation. In low-income neighbourhoods, shared taxis were commonly used for household and shop trips, and buses were often used for commutes. School and university students, as well as household size, provided valid trip predictions. Employees can predict work trips to the office, customer visits, and shop-related trips.

View article

1.      Ritchie, H. and Roser, M. (2018) - "Urbanization". Our World in Data,[ Online Resource

2.      United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. New York: United Nations (ST/ESA/SER.A/420).

3.      Sharma, A., Gani, A., Asirvatham, D., Ahmed, R., Hamzah, M., and Asli, M.F. (2021). Travel Behavior Modeling: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Opportunities. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 12(5), 774-786, DOI:  10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120590.

4.      Soteropoulos, A., Berger, M. and Ciari, F. (2018). Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: an international review of modelling studies. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 29–49, DOI: /10.1080/01441647.2018.1523253.

5.      De Gruyter, C. (2019). Multimodal Trip Generation from Land Use Developments: International Synthesis and Future Directions. Transportation Research Record, 2673(3), 136–152, DOI:10.1177/0361198119833967.

6.      Kroesen, K.  and Goulias, K. (2016). Modelling activity-travel behaviour dynamics with panel data: The state-of-the-art. EJTIR 16(4), pp. 633-637, DOI: 10.18757/ejtir.2016.16.4.3162.

7.      Arentze, T. and  Timmermans, H. (2008). Extending activity-based models of travel demand to represent activity-travel behaviour of children: Some descriptive results. Urban Transport XIV1. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, Vol 101, 609-618, DOI: 10.2495/UT080591.

8.      Witten, K., Huakau, J., Mavoa, S. (2011). Social and recreational travel: the destinations, travel modes and CO2 emissions of New Zealand households. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 2011, 37, 172-184.

9.      Daniels, R. and Mulley, C. (2013). Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply. Journal of Transport and Land Use, [online] 6(2), 5-20, DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.v6i2.308.

10.   Asad, F. H. A. (2015). City Centres: Understanding the Travel Behaviour of Residents and the Implications for Sustainable Travel. PhD thesis 2013, University of Salford DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1966.0889.

11.   Heinen. E, Steiner R. L., and Geurs K.T, (2015). Special issue: built environment and travel behaviour.  EJTIR 15(1), 1-5, DOI:10.18757/ejtir.2015.15.1.3051.

12.   De Vos, J., Ettema, D., Witlox, F., (2019). Effects of changing travel patterns on travel satisfaction: A focus on recently relocated residents. Travel Behaviour and Society 16, 42-49, DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2019.04.001.

13.   Nutsugbodo, R. Y.,  Amenumey, E. K.,  Mensah, C. A. (2018). Public transport mode preferences of international tourists in Ghana: Implications for transport planning. Travel Behaviour and Society11, 1-8, DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2017.11.002.

14.   Convery, Sh. and Williams B. (2016). Travel Exploring Determinants of Mode Choice for Non-Work Travel in the Greater Dublin Region. Proceedings of the ITRN2016, University of Limerick reland.

15.   Convery, Sh. and Williams, B. (2019). Determinants of Transport Mode Choice for Non-Commuting Trips: The Roles of Transport, Land Use and Socio-Demographic Characteristics. Urban Science. 3 (3): 82, DOI: 10.3390/urbansci3030082.

16.   Puntambekar, K. (2011). Travel behaviour studies facilitate integration of land use and transport planning. Urban Transport XVII 329, 116, DOI:10.2495/UT110281.

17.   Busari, A., Osuolale, O., Omole, D. and Ojo, A. (2015). Travel Behaviour of University Enviroment: Inter-Relationship Between Trip Distance and Travel Mode Choice In South-Western Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. Research India Publications 10, 42362-42366.

18.   Busari, A., Tenebe, I., Adekalu, K., Oniemayin, B., Ofuyatan, O., Bamgboye, G. O., Emenike, P. (2016). Assessment of the Trip Pattern of High Density Residential Zone in North Central Nigeria: Gender Perspective. 3rd International Conference on African Development Issues (CU-ICADI), 237-240.

19.   Sofia, G.G., Alhaddad, A.H. A., Al-Zubaidi, H. (2012). Trip Generation Modeling for Selected Zone in AL-Diwaniyah City. Journal of Engineering and Development, 16(4), 167-180.

20.   Anggraini, R., Sugiarto, S., and Pramanda, H. (2017). Factors affecting trip generation of motorcyclist for the purpose of non-mandatory activities. AIP Conference Proceedings 1903, 060011 (1), DOI: 10.1063/1.5011565.

21.   Amavi, A.A., Romero, J., Dominguez, A., Dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A. (2014). Advanced Trip Generation/Attraction Models. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 160, 430 – 439, DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.155.

22.   Department of Statistics (2021). Jordan statistical Yearbook.

23.   AL-Mahasneh, E. Z., Al-Habees M. A., and Al-Khaddam H. K. (2012). Urban Population Growth Trends in Jordan. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. 3 (11), 2014-2044.

24.   Sayaydeh, R. (2018). Sustainable Urban Planning and Public Transportation Amman. Sustainable development program Metropolitan government, Metropolis organization, Seoul, Korea.

25.   Greater Amman Municipality (2010). Transport Mobility Master Plan (TMMP) final report. 

26.   Naser, M.  Abu Qdais, S., and Faris, H. (2015). Developing Trip Generation Rates for Hospitals in Amman. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 9 (1), 8-19.

27.   Al-Masaeid, H. R. and Fayyad, S. (2018). Estimation of Trip Generation Rates for Residential Areas in Jordan. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(1), 162 -172.

28.   Institute of Transportation Engineers, ITE (2017). Trip General Manual. 10th Edition, Publication No. IR-016H 500/AGS/0917.