Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privreduJournal of Applied Engineering Science


DOI: 10.5937/jaes16-17164
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 terms and conditions. 
Creative Commons License

Volume 16 article 540 pages: 358 - 367

Katja Vogrinec
Masiv DOO, Gornja Radgona, Slovenia

Miroslav Premrov
University of Maribor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture, Maribor, Slovenia

Timber-frame panel buildings have a very specific composition where the main challenge represent mechanical fasteners, which are unable to provide a fully rigid connection. The stiffness of the timber-framed walls is thus largely dependent on various factors that influences its stiffness, such as the bending and the shear flexibility of the composite wall element, the flexibility of the fasteners between the timber frame and the sheathing board along with the flexibility of the tensile and compressive support. Despite the fact that these contributions to the stiffness of the timber-framed walls are not negligible, they are not considered in Eurocode 5 standard for design of timber structures. The current paper analyses the contribution of the tensile support and presents the experimental and analytical study of inter-storey hold-down connections in timber-framed panel construction system. Experimental tests are performed for two different hold-down connections appropriate for connecting timber-framed walls from the upper floor through the ceiling to the timber-framed-walls of the lower floor. Experimental results show that hold-down connections do not provide a rigid support conditions for the timber-framed walls and that their flexibility should be taken into account when calculating the overall horizontal stiffness of the timber-framed walls. Therefore, an analytical expression for determination of the stiffness of the hold-down is suggested for the hold-down connection with perforated strap. The formula can be used for analytical calculation of the stiffness of the timber-framed walls by taking into account the stiffness of the tensile support when a tested hold-down anchor is used.

View article

Operation part financed by the European Union, European Social Fund.

European Committee for Standardization. (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1. Brussels.

Pintaric, K., & Premrov, M. (2013). Mathematical modelling of timber-framed walls using fictive diagonal elements. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 8051-8059. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2013.02.050

Vogrinec, K., Premrov, M., & Kozem Silih, E. (2016). Simplified modelling of timber-framed walls under lateral loads. Engineering structures, 111, 275-284. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.029

Kessel, M.H. (2004). Vereinfachte Berechnung von scheibenartig beanspruchten Tafeln. In H.J. Blaß, K.J.H. Ehlbeck, & G. Steck (Eds.), Erlauterungen zu DIN. Munchen: DGfH Innovations und Service GmbH. 1052: 2004-08.

Casagrande, D., Rossi, S., Sartori, T., & Tomasi, R.(2016). Proposal of an analytical procedure and a simplified numerical model for elastic response of single-storey timber shear-walls. Construction and Building Materials, 102, 1101-1112. doi:10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2014.12.114

Casagrande, D., Rossi, S., Sartori, T., & Tomasi, R.(2012). Analytical and numerical analysis of timber framed shear walls. In World Conference on Timber Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand.

Sartori, T. (2012). Structural behavior of timber framed buildings. Dottorato di Ricerca in Ingegneria dei Sistemi Strutturali Civili e Meccanici XXV ciclo. Universita degli Studi di Trento.

Hoekstra, T. (2012). Multi-storey timber-frame building. Delft: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences. MSc Thesis.

European Committee for Standardization. (2004). Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures - Part 1-1: General - Common rules and rules for buildings, EN 1995-1-1. Brussels.

Prion, H.G.L., & Lam, F. (2003). Shear Walls and Diaphragms. In S. Thelandersson & H.J. Larsen (Eds.), Timber engineering. (pp. 383-408). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Premrov, M., & Dobrila, P. (2012). Numerical analysis of sheathing boards influence on racking resistance of timber-frame walls. Advances in Engineering Software, 45(1), 21-27. doi:10.1016/j. advengsoft.2011.09.012

Faherty, K.F., & Williamson, T.G. (1998). Wood Engineering and Construction Handbook, 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

Tomasi, R., & Sartori, T. (2013). Mechanical behaviour of connections between wood framed shear walls and foundations under monotonic and cyclic load. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 682- 690. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.055

Kessel, M.H., & Polatschek, T.M. (2009). Verankerung von HolztafelnTagungsband 21. Hildesheimer Informationstag Holzbau (21. HITH). HAWK Hildesheim.

zur Kammer, T. (2006). Zum raumlichen Tragverhalten mehrgeschossiger Gebaude in Holztafelbauart. Braunschweig: Institut fur Baukonstruktion und Holz-bau der Technischen Universitat Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig.

Kolb, J. (2008). Systems in Timber Engineering. Basel: Birkhauser.

Holzrahmenbau, Bewahrtes Hausbau-System, 4. Auflage. (2011). Koln: Bruderverlag.

Nelson, R.F., Patel, S.T., & Arevalo, R. (2003). Continuous tie-down systems for wood panel shear walls in multi story structures. Structure magazine, 1-16.

European Committee for Standardization. (1997). Timber structures – Joints made with mechanical fasteners – General principles for the determination of strength and deformation characteristics, EN 26891: 1997. Brussels.

European Committee for Standardization. (2009). Structural timber – Strength classes, EN 338: 2009. Brussels.