Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privreduJournal of Applied Engineering Science

DESIGN METHODS FOR COMPLIANT MECHANISMS USED IN NEW AGE INDUSTRIES – A REVIEW


DOI: 10.5937/jaes14-8229
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 terms and conditions. 
Creative Commons License

Volume 14 article 374 pages: 223-232

Pandiyan Arumugam
Saveetha University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, India

Arun Kumar
Saveetha University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, India

Compliant mechanisms have made an enormous contribution in various fields. Several methods have being conceived to analyze and design these compliant mechanisms that gain part of their motion from the deflection of flexible members rather than from movable joints only. Traditional rigidbody mechanisms have a number of components to apply their functions. Consequently they face problems such as backlash, wear, and increase in part-count, weight, assembly cost and time, regular maintenance. By reducing these problems will assist in increasing mechanism performance and cost reduction. Recently, many familiar examples of compliant mechanisms have been designed and widely used in various fields such as automotive industry, aerospace industry, MEMS, Medical devices, Robotic arm with minimal impedance due to its own mass & assistive mechanisms. For adaptive structures, components in transportations, hand-held tools, etc. however, the largest challenge was relative difficulty in analyzing and designing compliant mechanisms. Two approaches studied in the literature of kinematics-based approach and the structural optimization based approach. At present work is being carried out to analyze, the best suitable optimization method for designing a compliant mechanisms used in new age industries.

View article

Howell, L.L. (Eds.), 2001. Compliant Mechanisms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. United

States of America.

L. L. Howell and A. Midha. A method for the design of compliant mechanisms with smalllength flexural pivots. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 115:280–290, 1994.

M. D. Murphy, A. Midha, and L. L. Howell. The topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 31:185–199, 1996.

G. K. Ananthasuresh. PhD Thesis. A New Design Paradigm for Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems and Investigations on the Compliant Mechanism Synthesis. University Of Michigan, Ann Harbor, USA, 1994.

Canfield, S. and M. Fracker, 2000. ‘Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanical Amplifiers’, Journal of Structural Multidisc Optimization, 20: 269-279.

Anandhasuresh G.K. and A. Saxena, 2000. ‘On an Optimal Property of Compliant Topologies’, Journal of Structural Multidisc Optimization, 19: 36-49.

Wang M.Y., S. Chen and Y. Mei, 2005. ‘Design of Multimaterial Compliant Mechanisms using Level-set Methods’, Journal of Mechanical Design, 127: 941-956.

Ananthasuresh, G. K., Kota, S., and Kikuchi, K., 1994, “Strategies for Systematic Synthesis of Compliant MEMS,” 1994 Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, ASME, Chicago, IL, 55, pp. 677–686.

Frecker, M. I., Ananthasuresh, G. K., Nishiwaki, S., Kikuchi, N., and Kota, S., 1997,

“Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms Using Multi-Criteria Optimization,” J.Mech. Des., 119_2_, pp. 238–245.

Hetrick, J., and Kota, S., 1999, “An Energy Formulation for Parametric Size and Shape Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms,” J. Mech. Des., 121, pp. 229–234.

Joo, J., Kota, S., and Kikuchi, N., 2000, “Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms Using Linear Beam Elements,” Mech. Based Des. Struct. ach., 28_4_, pp. 245–280.

Mortensen, C.R., B.L. Weight, L.L. Howell and S.P. Magleby, 2000. Compliant mechanism prototyping. In: Proc. of DETC’00, ASME 2000 Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers & Information in Engineering Conference Baltimore, Maryland.

Larsen, U.D., O. Sigmund and S. Bouwstra, 1997. Design and fabrication of compliant micromechanisms and structures with negative poisson’s ratio. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 6: 99- 106.

Chen, L., 2001. Microfabrication of heterogeneous, optimized compliant mechanisms. NSF Summer Undergraduate Fellowship in Sensor Technologies (SUNFEST 2001), University of Rochester, Advisor, G.K. Ananthasuresh.

Sigmund, O., 1997. On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech. Struct. & Machines, 25: 493-524.

Solehuddin, S., A. Jamaluddin, M. Abd.Samad and A.M. Nizam, 2002. A novel design of a compliant one-piece nail clipper. In: Proc. of the 2nd World Engineering Congress,2002 WEC.

Howell, L.L. and A. Midha, 1996. A loop-closure theory for the analysis and synthesis of compliant mechanisms. SME J. Mech. Design, 118: 121- 125.

Ananthasuresh, G.K., S. Kota and Y. Gianchandani, 1994. A methodical approach

to the synthesis of micro-compliant mechanisms. Tech. Digest, Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop (held on Hilton Head Island, SC), pp: 189-192.

Saxena, A. and G.K. Ananthasuresh, 1998. An optimality criteria approach for the topology synthesis of compliant mechanisms. In: Proc. Of DETC’98, ASME Design, Engineering Technical Conf. (held in Atlanta, GA), DETC’98/MECH5937.

Saxena, A. and G.K. Ananthasuresh, 2000. On an optimal property of compliant topolo- gies. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 19: 36-49.

Sigmund, O., 2000. Topology optimisation: A tool for the tailoring of structures and materials. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 358: 211-227.

Frecker, M.I., 1997. Optimal design of compliant mechanisms. Ph. D. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering in the University of Michigan.

Canfield, S. and M. Frecker, 2000. Topology optimisation of compliant mechanical amplifiers for piezoelectric actuators. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 20: 269-279.

Pedersen, C.B.W., 2002. Topology optimisation of energy absorbing frames. In: Proc. Of WCCM V, 5th World Congress on Computational Mechanics.

Ansola, R., J. Canales, J.A. Tarrago and J. Rasmussen, 2002. On simultaneous shape and material layout optimisation of shell structures. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 24: 175- 184.

Li, Y., K. Saito and N. Kikuchi, 2002. Design of heat-actuated compliant mechanism and its application to product-embedded disassembly. In: Proc. 5th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM V), Vienna, Austria.

Nishiwaki, S., M.I. Frecker, S. Min and N. Kikuchi, 1998. Topology optimisation of compliant mechanisms using the homogenization method. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 42: 535-559.

Hammer, V.B. and N. Olhoff, 2000. Topology optimisation of continuum structures subjected to pressure loading. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 19: 85- 92.

Pedersen, C.B.W., T. Buhl and O. Sigmund, 2001. Topology synthesis of large-displacement compliant mechanisms. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 50: 2683-2705.

Frecker, M., S. Kota and N. Kikuchi, 1999. Topology optimisation of compliant mechanisms with multiple outputs. Struct. Optim., 17: 269-278.

Fuchs, M.B. and E. Moses, 2000. Optimal structural topologies with transmissible loads. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 19: 263-273.

Allaire, G. and C. Castro, 2002. Optimisation of nuclear fuel reloading by the homogenisation. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 24: 11-22.

Chen, T.Y. and C.Y. Lin, 2000. Determination of optimum design spaces for topology optimization. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 36: 1-16.

Borrvall, T. and J. Petersson, 2001. Topology optimisation using relularized intermediate density control. Comput.. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190: 4911-4928.Stolpe, M. and Svanberg, K. 2001, “On the Trajectories of Penalization Methods for Topology Optimisation”, Struct. Multidisc Optim Vol. 21, pp.128-139.

Stolpe, M. and K. Svanberg, 2001. An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 22: 116-124.

Hsu, Y.L., M.S. Hsu and C.T. Chen, 2001. Interpreting results from topology optimization using density contours. Computers & Structures, 79: 1049-1058.

Bulman, S., J. Sienz and E. Hinton, 2001. Comparisons between algorithms for structural topology optimisation using a series of benchmark studies. Computers & Structures,79: 1203-1218.

Salman, B.A., 1989, “Mechanical Advantage Aspects in Compliant Mechanisms Design,” M.S. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette,IN.

Burns, R.H., 1964, “The Kinetostatic Synthesis of Flexible Link Mechanisms,” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New Haven. CT.

Burns, R.H., and Crossley, F.R.E., 1968, “Kinetostatics Synthesis of Flexible Link

Mechanisms,” ASME Paper 68-Mech-5.

Howell, L.l.., and Midha, A., 1993, “Compliant Mechanisms,” Section 9.10 in Modern Kinematics: Developments in the last Forty Years, (A.G. Erdman, ed), Wiley, New York, pp. 422-428.

K. Schittkowski. Optimization in industrial engineering: Sqp - methods and applications. RadiossUser Meeting, Mecalog, Nice, 2005.

Belegundu, A. and T. Chadruparla, 1999. ‘Optimization Concepts and Applications in Engineering’, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall Publications.

A. Remouchamps and Y. Radovcic. Boss quattro: an open system for parametric design. JournalStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 23:140–152, 2002

Deepak, R., M. Dinesh, D.K. Sahu and G.K. Ananthasuresh, 2009. ‘A Comparative Study of the Formulations and Benchmark Problems for the Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms’, Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 1: 215-222.

Frecker, M. and S. Kota, 1997. ‘Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms

Using Multi-Criteria Optimization’, Journal of Mechanical Design, Transaction

of ASME, 119: 238-245.

Kikuchi, N. and S. Nishiwaki,1998. ‘Design Optimization method for Compliant Mechanisms and Material Microstructure’, Journal of Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 151: 401-417.

Bendsoe, M.P. and N. Kikuchi, 1998. ‘Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using a Homogenization Method’, Journal of Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 71: 197-224.

 Hetric, J.A. and S. Kota, 1999. ‘An Energy Formulation for Parametric Size

and Shape Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms’, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 121: 229-234.

K. J. Lu and S. Kota. An effective method of synthesizing compliant adaptive

structures using load path representation. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Structures, 16:307–317, 2005.